•  
  •  
 

Information for Authors

About the Journal

Neutrosophic Systems with Applications (NSWA) is an international, peer-reviewed, open-access journal dedicated to publishing high-quality, original research. The journal is published monthly, both online and in print, by Sciences Force LLC.

NSWA focuses on advanced studies in neutrosophy and related fields, including neutrosophic sets, logic, probability, statistics, algebraic structures, hypersoft sets, plithogenic sets, NeutroAlgebra, AntiAlgebra, NeutroGeometry, and AntiGeometry. It also explores their applications in intelligent systems, computer science, decision support systems, and other related areas.

For more information about the journal's focus and peer-review policy, please see the Aims & Scope page.

As an open-access journal, NSWA ensures that all published research is freely accessible online, allowing anyone to read and cite your work.

Please note that this journal only publishes manuscripts in English.

Journal History

Neutrosophic Systems with Applications (NSWA) was founded in December 2022, with its inaugural volume published in January 2023 under the University of New Mexico as its original publisher. The journal was established to meet the growing interest in neutrosophy and its practical applications. Since its inception, NSWA has aimed to provide a platform for researchers and practitioners to disseminate innovative findings and methodologies in the field. In 2024, the journal transitioned its publishing responsibilities to Sciences Force LLC, enhancing its editorial and technical support.

Today, NSWA continues to be a key resource for those exploring the complexities of neutrosophic systems and their applications, promoting high-quality research that addresses real-world challenges in modern computational and informational systems.

Language

Manuscripts should be written in clear and concise English. Authors who are not proficient in idiomatic English are strongly encouraged to seek language editing assistance before submission. Reviewers are not responsible for correcting language issues, and poor grammar or unclear writing may undermine the scientific quality of the paper, potentially leading to delays in the review process or rejection.

Types of Articles

NSWA publishes the following types of articles:

  • Research articles
  • Review articles
  • Mini-reviews
  • Perspectives
  • Correspondences
  • Comments
  • Short communications
  • Case studies

Research articles must include the following components:

  • Motivation for the work
  • An overview of relevant literature with up-to-date references
  • A clear statement of the novelty of the research
  • Suitable theoretical background
  • One or more examples to demonstrate and discuss the presented ideas
  • Conclusions

Article Types and Suggested Word Counts

At NSWA, we welcome a variety of article types that reflect the broad range of research and perspectives within the field of neutrosophic systems. Below is a description of each article category, along with general word count guidelines to help authors plan their submissions.

  1. Research Articles
    These are full-length, original research papers that present new theoretical developments or applied findings in neutrosophic systems or related areas. Articles should include a clear motivation, a solid literature review, a well-defined methodology, results, and a strong conclusion.
    Recommended length: 5,000–8,000 words
  2. Review Articles
    Review articles offer an in-depth and critical summary of existing literature on a well-established or emerging topic. Authors are expected to analyze trends, highlight key findings, and identify gaps in current research.
    Recommended length: 6,000–10,000+ words (flexible based on the topic’s scope)
  3. Mini-Reviews
    These shorter reviews focus on specific topics or narrow subfields. They are designed to provide a quick yet insightful overview of recent advances or trends.
    Recommended length: 3,000–4,500 words
  4. Perspectives
    Perspective articles offer scholarly opinions on current challenges, open questions, or future directions in the field. These pieces are forward-looking and may include conceptual ideas, theoretical reflections, or proposals for new areas of research.
    Recommended length: 2,000–4,000 words
  5. Correspondences
    These are short letters intended to share comments on recent publications, propose new ideas, or offer brief technical notes. They are typically more informal than full research articles.
    Recommended length: 1,000–2,000 words
  6. Comments
    Commentaries provide constructive critiques or alternative views on previously published articles in NSWA. Authors should aim to engage respectfully and critically, offering insights that may have been overlooked or interpreted differently.
    Recommended length: 1,000–2,000 words
  7. Short Communications
    These articles report important findings that are concise but meaningful. They are ideal for presenting new results that don’t require a full-length paper but still contribute significantly to the field.
    Recommended length: 2,500–4,000 words
  8. Case Studies
    Case studies explore real-world applications of neutrosophic theory. Articles should describe the context of the case, the methodology used, the outcomes, and the broader implications of the work.
    Recommended length: 4,000–7,000 words

Guidance on Extended Conference Papers

If extensions of previously published conference papers are submitted, editors will verify that sufficient new material has been added to meet the journal's standards and qualify for review. The added material must not have been previously published. While new results are encouraged, they are not strictly required; however, submissions should expand on key ideas, examples, and elaborations from the conference submission.

Before Submission

Manuscripts must be submitted with the understanding that they are original, have not been previously published, and are not under consideration by another journal. The submitting author is responsible for confirming that all co-authors have approved the manuscript for publication and that all necessary institutional permissions have been obtained. The official receipt date is recognized only upon acknowledgment from the editorial office. Unless stated otherwise, further communication and proofing will be directed to the author(s) prior to publication. By submitting, authors agree to allow editorial revisions to enhance clarity and readability. Any questions regarding the publication of accepted papers should be directed to nswa@sciencesforce.com.

Preparation of Manuscripts

Authors must use the journal’s Microsoft Word template to prepare their manuscripts. Utilizing this template will significantly expedite the copyediting and publication process for accepted manuscripts.

  • Microsoft Word: Manuscripts prepared in Microsoft Word must be converted into a single file before submission.
  • Supplementary Files: These may be in any format, but it is recommended to use common, non-proprietary formats whenever possible (e.g., CSV for datasets, TXT or PDF for additional documentation, MP4 for videos, PNG/JPEG for images, and ZIP for grouped files). Authors should ensure that supplementary files are clearly labeled and referenced appropriately within the main text.

Structure of Research and Review Manuscripts

Research manuscripts should include the following components:

  • Front Matter: Title, Author list, Affiliations, Abstract, Keywords
  • Main Sections: Introduction, Materials and Methods, Results, Discussion, and Conclusions (optional).
  • Back Matter: Supplementary Materials, Acknowledgments, Author Contributions, Conflicts of Interest, and References.

Review manuscripts should consist of the front matter, literature review sections, and back matter. The template can also be used for preparing the front and back matter of review manuscripts.

Additional Formatting Guidelines

  • Abbreviations should be defined in parentheses the first time they appear in the abstract, main text, and figure or table captions.
  • Use SI Units (International System of Units). Convert imperial, US customary, and other units to SI units whenever possible.
  • Equations: If using Word, please utilize either the Microsoft Equation Editor or the MathType add-on. Equations should be editable by the editorial office and not presented as images.

Research Data and Supplementary Materials

Publication of your manuscript implies that all associated materials, data, and protocols must be made available to readers. Please disclose any restrictions on the availability of materials or information at the submission stage.

Online Submission

Manuscripts must be submitted via the online Manuscript Tracking System (MTS) by one of the authors, following the on-screen instructions. Only Word format files (.doc, .docx) are accepted, and there are no restrictions on length. Submissions made by individuals not listed as authors will be rejected. The submitting author is responsible for the manuscript throughout the submission and peer review process. If technical issues arise during submission through the MTS, authors should contact nswa@sciencesforce.com for assistance.

Initial Evaluation

All submitted manuscripts undergo an initial evaluation by the Editorial Office to ensure proper formatting and compliance with the journal’s ethical guidelines. Each manuscript is also screened for potential plagiarism using iThenticate. Submissions that do not align with the journal’s ethical standards or quality criteria will be declined before entering peer review. Incomplete or improperly formatted manuscripts will be returned to the authors without scientific evaluation. Following these preliminary checks, the Editorial Office will consult the Editor-in-Chief to assess whether the manuscript meets the journal’s scope and scientific standards. Manuscripts lacking sufficient priority for publication will be promptly rejected. Authors are expected to write in clear, grammatically correct English. The Editor reserves the right to reject any manuscript due to inadequate language quality, with all such decisions confirmed by the Editor-in-Chief.

Submission Declaration and Verification

By submitting an article, authors confirm that the work has not been previously published (except as an abstract, lecture, or academic thesis), is not under review elsewhere, and has been approved for publication by all authors and, where applicable, by the relevant institutional authorities. Furthermore, if accepted, the article will not be published in the same form, in English or any other language, including online, without written permission from the copyright holder. To ensure originality, all manuscripts submitted to NSWA are checked for plagiarism using the Crossref Similarity Check powered by iThenticate.

Article Structure

Manuscripts should be compiled in the following order:

  1. Title page
  2. Abstract and Keywords
  3. Introduction
  4. Material and methods
  5. Results
  6. Discussion (Results and discussion can be combined in one section)
  7. Conclusion
  8. Acknowledgments
  9. Conflicts of Interest
  10. References
  11. Tables
  12. Figures

Title Page

The title page should include the following details in English only:

  • Title: The title should be brief, concise, and descriptive, without any literature references, compound numbers, or non-standardized abbreviations. It should be centered and typed in Times New Roman, 14-point boldface.
  • Authors and Affiliations: Provide full names, including middle initials and family names, for complete identification. This information should be centered beneath the title and typed in Times New Roman, 11-point non-italic boldface. Use superscript lowercase letters to indicate different affiliations, which should be detailed and include the department, faculty/college, university, city with zip code or P.O. Box, and country. The primary affiliation for each author should reflect the institution where most of their work was conducted. If an author has since moved, the current address may also be included; however, addresses will not be updated after publication.
  • Corresponding Author: The corresponding author should be indicated with an asterisk, and their contact details (telephone, fax, and email address) should be placed in a footnote. If available, include the 16-digit ORCID of the corresponding author.
  • Short Running Title: A short running title (running head) with maximum 15 words.

Abstract

The abstract should be a single paragraph with a maximum of 250 words. It should follow the style of structured abstracts, but without headings: 1) Background: Place the question addressed in a broad context and highlight the purpose of the study; 2) Methods: Briefly describe the main methods. 3) Results: Summarize the article's main findings; and 4) Conclusion: Indicate the main conclusions or interpretations. The abstract should objectively represent the article and must not include results that are not presented and substantiated in the main text or exaggerate the main conclusions.

Keywords

Include three to seven (3-7) pertinent keywords after the abstract. The keywords should be specific to the article and reasonably common within the subject discipline.

Introduction

The introduction should briefly place the study in a broad context and highlight its importance. It should define the purpose of the work and its significance, including specific hypotheses being tested. A careful review of the current state of the research field should be provided, with key publications cited. Controversial and diverging hypotheses should be highlighted when necessary. Finally, briefly mention the main aim of the work and summarize the main conclusions.

Material and Methods

This section should provide sufficient detail to allow others to replicate and build upon the published results. New methods and protocols should be described in detail, while well-established methods can be briefly summarized and appropriately cited. Include the name and version of any software used and clarify whether the computer code is available. Any preregistration codes should also be included.

Results and Discussion

  • Results: Provide a concise and precise description of the experimental results and their interpretation as well as the experimental conclusions that can be drawn.
  • Discussion: Authors should discuss the results in relation to previous studies and the working hypotheses. The implications of the findings should be addressed in the broadest context possible, with limitations of the work highlighted. Future research directions should also be mentioned. This section may be combined with the Results.

Conclusion(s)

The main conclusion(s) of the study should be presented in a brief statement that highlights the study's goals and significance. New hypotheses should be stated when warranted, and recommendations may be included as appropriate.

Acknowledgment(s)

All sources of funding for the study must be disclosed. Clearly indicate any grants received in support of the research and any funds used to cover publication costs.

Conflicts of Interest

Authors must identify and declare any personal circumstances or interests that could be perceived as influencing the representation or interpretation of the reported research results. If there are no conflicts of interest, please state, "The authors declare no conflict of interest."

References

References must be numbered in the order of their appearance in the text (including table captions and figure legends) and listed individually at the end of the manuscript. Include the Digital Object Identifier (DOI) for all references where available.

Figures and Tables

Preparing Figures, Schemes, and Tables:

  • Files for figures and schemes must be provided during submission in a single zip archive and at a sufficiently high resolution (minimum 1000 pixels in width/height, or a resolution of 300 dpi or higher). Common formats are accepted; however, TIFF, JPEG, EPS, and PDF are preferred.
  • All figures, schemes, and tables should be inserted into the main text close to their first citation and must be numbered in the order of appearance (e.g., Figure 1, Scheme I, Figure 2, Scheme II, Table 1).
  • Each figure, scheme, and table should have a short explanatory title and caption.
  • All table columns should have descriptive headings. To facilitate the copy-editing of larger tables, smaller fonts may be used, but should not be less than 8 pt in size. Authors should use the Table option of Microsoft Word to create tables.
  • Authors are encouraged to prepare figures and schemes in color (RGB at 8-bit per channel). There is no additional cost for publishing full-color graphics.

Nomenclature and Units

All measurements and data should be presented in SI units where possible or in other internationally accepted units in parentheses throughout the text. Illustrations and tables should use conventional units, with conversion factors provided in legends or footnotes.

Statements & Declarations

The following statements must be included in your submitted manuscript under the heading "Statements and Declarations," placed after the References section. Please note that submissions lacking these required statements will be returned as incomplete.

Some Statements & Declarations have been included in the PDF of research papers since the first volume of 2023, for example, "Data availability," "Ethical approval," and "Conflict of interest." Also, since the beginning of Volume 10, 2023, "Acknowledgments" has been included in the data and declarations. Also, starting with Volume 16 of 2024, Author Contributions and Funding are included in the Statements & Declarations.

Funding

Authors must disclose any sources of funding that supported the work. The statement should include details of any grants received, specifying the funding agency and grant number in square brackets (if applicable). Example statements include:

  • “This work was supported by [Funding Agency] [grant numbers]. Author A.B. has received research support from Company A.”
  • “The authors declare that no funds, grants, or other support were received during the preparation of this manuscript.”
    •

Competing Interests

Authors are required to disclose any financial or non-financial interests that could directly or indirectly influence their work. Interests from the last three years should be reported, while those outside this timeframe must be disclosed if they could be perceived as influencing the submitted work. Example statements include:

  • “Financial interests: Authors A and B declare they have no financial interests. Author C has received speaker and consultant honoraria from Company M. Dr. C has received speaker honorarium and research funding from Company M and Company N. Author D has received travel support from Company O. Non-financial interests: Author D has served on advisory boards for Company M and Company N.”
  • “The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.”
    •

Author Contributions

Authors are encouraged to specify each contributor’s role in the research and manuscript preparation. Example statement:

  • “All authors contributed to the study conception and design. Material preparation, data collection and analysis were performed by [full name], [full name] and [full name]. The first draft of the manuscript was written by [full name] and all authors commented on previous versions. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.”

Data Availability

The journal encourages authors to provide an optional statement regarding data availability. Data Availability Statements should indicate where data supporting the results can be found, including hyperlinks to publicly archived datasets when applicable. Example statements include:

  • “The datasets generated [and/or analysed] during the current study are available in the [NAME] repository, [PERSISTENT LINK]”
  • “The datasets generated [and/or analysed] during the current study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.”
    •

Ethics Approval

Authors of research involving human or animal subjects should include a statement that confirms that the study was approved (or granted exemption) by the appropriate institutional and/or national research ethics committee (including the name of the ethics committee and reference number, if available). For research involving animals, their data or biological material, authors should supply detailed information on the ethical treatment of their animals in their submission. If a study was granted exemption or did not require ethics approval, this should also be detailed in the manuscript.

Consent to Participate

For all research involving human subjects, freely-given, informed consent to participate in the study must be obtained from participants (or their parent or legal guardian in the case of children under 16) and a statement to this effect should appear in the manuscript.
Example statement:

  • “Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.”
  • “Written informed consent was obtained from the parents.”
    •

Consent to Publish

Individuals may consent to participate in a study, but object to having their data published in a journal article. If your manuscript contains any individual person’s data in any form (including any individual details, images or videos), consent for publication must be obtained from that person, or in the case of children, their parent or legal guardian. This is in particular applicable to case studies. A statement confirming that consent to publish has been received from all participants should appear in the manuscript.
Example statement:

  • “The authors affirm that human research participants provided informed consent for publication of the images in Figure(s) 1a, 1b and 1c.”
    •

Proofs

A set of page proofs (in PDF format) will be emailed to the corresponding author. These proofs are intended solely for reviewing the typesetting, formatting, and accuracy of the text, tables, and figures. To facilitate prompt and accurate publication, please return all corrections in a single response within two days. Proofreading is the author's responsibility. If no response is received within this timeframe, the publisher may proceed with publication as is.

Revised Manuscripts

When revising your manuscript, please upload the following files:

  • Revised manuscript: Clarify the changes made since the original submission using the "Track Changes" option in Microsoft Word. Upload this as a "Revised Article with Changes Highlighted" file.
  • Response to reviewers: Address the specific points raised by each reviewer. Include your responses to all comments from reviewers and editors, along with a list of changes made to the manuscript. Upload this document as a "Response to Reviewers" file.
  • Revised manuscript (clean copy): Upload a clean copy of your revised manuscript that does not show tracked changes. This should be uploaded as your "Manuscript" file.

After Acceptance

Once your article is accepted, it will proceed to the production stage for typesetting. After typesetting is completed, you will receive the proofs for review.

Peer Review

The journal is committed to maintaining rigorous peer-review standards and ensuring the integrity of the evaluation process. Upon submission, each manuscript is first reviewed by the editor to determine its relevance and suitability for the journal. Manuscripts may be rejected at this stage if they lack originality, contain significant scientific flaws, require substantial language editing, or fall outside the journal’s scope. Submissions deemed appropriate are then forwarded to at least two independent reviewers for a thorough assessment of their scientific merit. The journal follows a double-blind peer-review system, ensuring the identities of reviewers remain anonymous to the authors. Final decisions are made by the editors based on the reviewers’ evaluations, and authors receive these reports along with the editorial outcome. It is important to note that even if one review is favorable, substantial concerns raised by another reviewer may lead to the rejection of the manuscript.

Ethical Guidelines

Studies involving human or animal subjects must adhere to established ethical standards. For research involving human participants, all procedures must comply with the Declaration of Helsinki (1964). Manuscripts reporting experiments that may pose risks to human subjects must include a statement confirming that informed consent was obtained and that the study was approved by an appropriate ethics committee. For animal research, authors must provide detailed descriptions of any anesthesia or surgical methods used, along with assurances that every effort was made to minimize animal suffering throughout the study.

Complying with Ethics of Experimentation

NSWA does not generally publish research involving human participants or animal subjects. However, in the rare cases where such studies are included, authors must clearly state that their work complies with recognized ethical standards.

For any study involving human or animal subjects, authors must provide:

  • The name of the ethics committee or institutional review board that approved the study.
  • The approval reference number, if available.
  • A statement confirming informed consent from human participants or ethical treatment of animals.

All such studies must align with relevant international guidelines, including the Declaration of Helsinki for human research and the ARRIVE Guidelines for animal research.

Manuscripts lacking clear ethical declarations may be rejected or withdrawn.

Supplementary Materials

Authors should describe any supplementary material published online alongside the manuscript (e.g. figures, tables, videos, spreadsheets). Please indicate the name and title of each element as follows: Figure S1: title, Table S1: title, etc.

Additional data and files can be uploaded as "Supplementary Files" during the manuscript submission process. The supplementary files will also be available to the referees as part of the peer-review process. Any file format is acceptable; however, we recommend using common, non-proprietary formats whenever possible (e.g., CSV for datasets, TXT or PDF for additional documentation, MP4 for videos, PNG/JPEG for images, and ZIP for grouped files). Authors should ensure that supplementary files are clearly labeled and referenced appropriately within the main text.

References for Supplementary Files

Citations and references in supplementary files are permitted provided that they also appear in the reference list of the main text.

Article Publishing Charge

The journal does not charge any Article Processing Fees (APC) for submitted manuscripts.