ORCID
Muhammad Aslam: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0644-1950
Abdulrahman AlAita: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3089-3781
Florentin Smarandache: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5560-5926
Article Type
Research Article
Abstract
Neutrosophic statistical analysis has gained attention for incorporating the degree of indeterminacy when analyzing imprecise and interval data under uncertainty–-an aspect often overlooked by classical statistics, fuzzy statistical analysis, and interval statistics. Recently, critical discussions have emerged regarding the use and applications of neutrosophic statistics, with some questioning its usefulness and validity. In this paper, we present a critical assessment of the existing literature, focusing on areas where misunderstandings and misinterpretations of neutrosophic statistical methods have occurred. We also examine flawed comparisons made between the results of neutrosophic statistics and interval statistics. Furthermore, substantial issues have been identified in the current simulation, both in its application and in the comparison of results. The objective of this paper is to highlight these key concerns and provide clarity for researchers working in this area, helping them to better understand the appropriate applications of neutrosophic statistical methods.
Keywords
Classical statistics, interval-statistics, simulation, neutrosophic data, interval-data
How to Cite
Aslam, Muhammad; AlAita, Abdulrahman; and Smarandache, Florentin (2025) "A Critical Evaluation of the Criticisms against Neutrosophic Statistical Methods," Neutrosophic Systems with Applications: Vol. 25: Iss. 6, Article 5.
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.